Lizzie Harewood, CEO of the Association of Christian Teachers, explains the recent Government proposals on the teaching of RSHE to primary school pupils.
The draft RSHE* guidance from the Department for Education arrived this week, with Rishi Sunak saying it ensures the protection of children from exposure to “disturbing content.” The guidance advises against teaching gender identity and defers explicit discussions on sex until age 13. It underscores the importance of teaching biological facts and introduces age limits; prohibiting sex education for primary school children until Year 5, when they are aged 9 and over.
As head of the Association of Christian Teachers, I feel cautiously optimistic. This, alongside other recent developments signify a ‘sea change’ in the zeitgeist around issues of gender and sexuality. However, my optimism is tempered by the knowledge that this is probably only the beginning of a journey away from ideologies that have become embedded within our educational institutions.
Incidents like class trips to Pride marches, mandatory ‘Rainbow days’ and disciplinary actions against Christian teachers for issues of inclusivity are alarming
For several years, Christian teachers have expressed unease about RSHE curriculum. Many feel sidelined when teaching content they view as biased against Christian beliefs. Growing concerns involve the promotion of political ideologies on identity and morality. Incidents like class trips to Pride marches, mandatory ‘Rainbow days’ and disciplinary actions against Christian teachers for issues of inclusivity are alarming.
One teacher I heard from had this to say:
“School bought in the ‘Sexual Circus’ company, which perform circus acts interspersed with short talks about sex and masturbation.”
Another said:
“It was certainly made clear by the PSHE lead during the latest PSHE CPD** that non-conformity to gender stereotypes is synonymous with having a different gender.”
Another teacher recalled:
“One speaker said it was ‘fine to watch porn so long as it is ethically sourced’ and provided links to sites students could explore.”
These objections to ‘inclusive’ materials are not about bigotry or intolerance; I’m a teacher. But my primary concern about RSHE teaching isn’t just the comfort of Christian educators or my own children, it’s for the wellbeing and flourishing of an entire generation of young people navigating a world filled with conflicting ideologies on sexuality and gender.
Children have been caught up in an ideological battle
Read more on education in schools
God shows us who we are through our bodies, designed for different roles in reproduction. Genesis 1 connects our creation as male and female to the command to be fruitful and multiply, providing a clear basis to distinguish between men and women, and protect the rights of women and girls. The Bible teaches that marriage, an intimate lifelong union between one man and one woman, is the only appropriate place for sexual intercourse, reflecting the goodness of God’s design for us.
And research affirms this. Studies show that marriage enhances stability for parents and provides a buffer against issues for children. It remains a significant protective factor even when considering background and other factors.
Yet, since the law on RSHE changed in 2019, the floodgates opened. Evidence of political bias and disregard for traditional or Christian views on relationships was abundant in many materials.
Children have been caught up in an ideological battle and even Dr Cass - the paediatrician who led the review into NHS gender identity services - said that children had been “let down” by a failure to base care on evidence.
the solution to safeguarding children online isn’t to lower the bar of what we teach
There will be lots of discussion over the coming weeks about whether this is the right course of action to safeguard our children and minimise risk. Critics will say that children will search elsewhere for information on sex or gender identity. However, the solution to safeguarding children online isn’t to lower the bar of what we teach to match the most disturbing online content or to introduce concepts prematurely ‘just in case’. Instead, it involves raising awareness of unsafe images, shielding them from harmful content, and maintaining the apolitical nature of curriculum content.
In a secularised and fragmented world, grounding our education system in science, reason, and truth is crucial. And let’s pray for Christian teachers to be the leaders in delivering curriculum in a sensitive, responsible way, obeying the call in Colossians 3 to “clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience”.
Read the review of the RHSE statutory guidance here.
*Relationships, Sex and Health Education
**Personal, Social, Health and Economic Education and Continuing Professional Development
No comments yet